Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwm-names in example

2018-08-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 03:58:55PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, > and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwm-names on the vibrator node has these > two values swapped. This patch corrects the values for pwm-names. > >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwm-names in example

2018-08-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 03:58:55PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, > and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwm-names on the vibrator node has these > two values swapped. This patch corrects the values for pwm-names. > >

[PATCH] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwm-names in example

2018-08-18 Thread Brian Masney
In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwm-names on the vibrator node has these two values swapped. This patch corrects the values for pwm-names. Signed-off-by: Brian Masney --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts is actual

[PATCH] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwm-names in example

2018-08-18 Thread Brian Masney
In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin, and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwm-names on the vibrator node has these two values swapped. This patch corrects the values for pwm-names. Signed-off-by: Brian Masney --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts is actual