On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:20 PM Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 07/24/2018 01:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 'interrupt-parent' is often documented as part of define bindings, but
> > it is really outside the scope of a device binding. It's never required
> > in a given node as it is
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:20 PM Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 07/24/2018 01:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 'interrupt-parent' is often documented as part of define bindings, but
> > it is really outside the scope of a device binding. It's never required
> > in a given node as it is
Hi Rob,
On 07/24/2018 01:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> 'interrupt-parent' is often documented as part of define bindings, but
> it is really outside the scope of a device binding. It's never required
> in a given node as it is often inherited from a parent node. Or it can
> be implicit if a parent
Hi Rob,
On 07/24/2018 01:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> 'interrupt-parent' is often documented as part of define bindings, but
> it is really outside the scope of a device binding. It's never required
> in a given node as it is often inherited from a parent node. Or it can
> be implicit if a parent
4 matches
Mail list logo
