On 7/13/2012 6:07 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2012/7/13 Andrew Morton :
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:04:53 +0900
>> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>
>>> The function dup_task() may fail at the following function calls in
>>> the following order.
>>>
>>> 0) alloc_task_struct_node()
>>> 1) alloc_thread_info_node()
2012/7/13 Andrew Morton :
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:04:53 +0900
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>
>> The function dup_task() may fail at the following function calls in
>> the following order.
>>
>> 0) alloc_task_struct_node()
>> 1) alloc_thread_info_node()
>> 2) arch_dup_task_struct()
>>
>> Error by 0) is n
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:04:53 +0900
Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The function dup_task() may fail at the following function calls in
> the following order.
>
> 0) alloc_task_struct_node()
> 1) alloc_thread_info_node()
> 2) arch_dup_task_struct()
>
> Error by 0) is not a matter, it can just return. But
The function dup_task() may fail at the following function calls in
the following order.
0) alloc_task_struct_node()
1) alloc_thread_info_node()
2) arch_dup_task_struct()
Error by 0) is not a matter, it can just return. But error by 1)
requires releasing task_struct allocated by 0) before it ret
4 matches
Mail list logo