Re: [PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set.

2018-07-13 Thread Al Viro
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 07:09:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > More simple version. Is this assumption correct? Racy, for obvious reasons (sget/sget)

Re: [PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set.

2018-07-13 Thread Al Viro
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 07:09:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > More simple version. Is this assumption correct? Racy, for obvious reasons (sget/sget)

[PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set.

2018-07-13 Thread Tetsuo Handa
More simple version. Is this assumption correct? >From 52f10183f2b921cd946dd4c83d9b1d99bc48914e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tetsuo Handa Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:15:54 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set. syzbot is reporting hung tasks at iterate_sup

[PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set.

2018-07-13 Thread Tetsuo Handa
More simple version. Is this assumption correct? >From 52f10183f2b921cd946dd4c83d9b1d99bc48914e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tetsuo Handa Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:15:54 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] fs: Add to super_blocks list after SB_BORN is set. syzbot is reporting hung tasks at iterate_sup