On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> The spinlock 'slock' is used now to protect pcf857x_irq() from itself
> which is unnecessary (especially after switching to use threaded
> IRQs). Hence, remove it and use mutex to protect device data in IRQ
> handler.
>
> Cc: Geert
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.stras...@ti.com wrote:
The spinlock 'slock' is used now to protect pcf857x_irq() from itself
which is unnecessary (especially after switching to use threaded
IRQs). Hence, remove it and use mutex to protect device data in IRQ
The spinlock 'slock' is used now to protect pcf857x_irq() from itself
which is unnecessary (especially after switching to use threaded
IRQs). Hence, remove it and use mutex to protect device data in IRQ
handler.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko
---
The spinlock 'slock' is used now to protect pcf857x_irq() from itself
which is unnecessary (especially after switching to use threaded
IRQs). Hence, remove it and use mutex to protect device data in IRQ
handler.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko
4 matches
Mail list logo