Hi Richard,
On 09/07/2013 11:21 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michael Opdenacker
> wrote:
>> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
>> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michael Opdenacker
wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
> ---
> arch/h8300/kernel/timer/itu.c | 2 +-
>
This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
---
arch/h8300/kernel/timer/itu.c | 2 +-
arch/h8300/kernel/timer/timer16.c | 2 +-
arch/h8300/kernel/timer/timer8.c
This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/h8300/kernel/timer/itu.c | 2 +-
arch/h8300/kernel/timer/timer16.c | 2
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michael Opdenacker
michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com wrote:
This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
Hi Richard,
On 09/07/2013 11:21 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michael Opdenacker
michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com wrote:
This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be
6 matches
Mail list logo