On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Feel free to ignore if this is a topic already discussed in other
> > threads. To be honest, I did not search the mailing list to determine if
> > this particular issue was already discussed.
>
> Not this particular issue, but
> Feel free to ignore if this is a topic already discussed in other
> threads. To be honest, I did not search the mailing list to determine if
> this particular issue was already discussed.
Not this particular issue, but in general we usually don't change
working code to silence false positives
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 06:28:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:18:25PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote:
> > The following smatch error was introduced by commit 7ca5f6be7900 ("i2c:
> > recovery: add get_bus_free callback"):
> >
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:228 i2c_generi
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:18:25PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote:
> The following smatch error was introduced by commit 7ca5f6be7900 ("i2c:
> recovery: add get_bus_free callback"):
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:228 i2c_generic_scl_recovery() error:
> uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
>
> Analysis of
The following smatch error was introduced by commit 7ca5f6be7900 ("i2c:
recovery: add get_bus_free callback"):
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:228 i2c_generic_scl_recovery() error: uninitialized
symbol 'ret'.
Analysis of the code appears to show that the smatch error is a false
positive since 'ret'
5 matches
Mail list logo
