On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:44:14PM +0200, Claudio Foellmi wrote:
> Move the check for a stuck SCL before the check for a high SDA.
> This prevent false positives in the specific case that SDA is fine
> and SCL is stuck, which previously returned 0.
>
> Also check SDA again after the loop, if we
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:44:14PM +0200, Claudio Foellmi wrote:
> Move the check for a stuck SCL before the check for a high SDA.
> This prevent false positives in the specific case that SDA is fine
> and SCL is stuck, which previously returned 0.
>
> Also check SDA again after the loop, if we
Move the check for a stuck SCL before the check for a high SDA.
This prevent false positives in the specific case that SDA is fine
and SCL is stuck, which previously returned 0.
Also check SDA again after the loop, if we can.
Together, these changes should lead to a lot more failed
recoveries
Move the check for a stuck SCL before the check for a high SDA.
This prevent false positives in the specific case that SDA is fine
and SCL is stuck, which previously returned 0.
Also check SDA again after the loop, if we can.
Together, these changes should lead to a lot more failed
recoveries
4 matches
Mail list logo