Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-30 Thread Ioan Nicu
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:29:33PM +0100, ext Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Ioan Nicu wrote: > > Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when > > the necessary dependencies are not there yet. > > > > The driver core is already printing a message when

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-30 Thread Ioan Nicu
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:29:33PM +0100, ext Wolfram Sang wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Ioan Nicu wrote: Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when the necessary dependencies are not there yet. The driver core is already printing a message when a driver

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-27 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Ioan Nicu wrote: > Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when > the necessary dependencies are not there yet. > > The driver core is already printing a message when a driver > requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs >

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-27 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Ioan Nicu wrote: Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when the necessary dependencies are not there yet. The driver core is already printing a message when a driver requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs without

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-26 Thread Alexander Sverdlin
On 25/03/15 18:43, Ioan Nicu wrote: > Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when > the necessary dependencies are not there yet. > > The driver core is already printing a message when a driver > requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs > without these error

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-26 Thread Alexander Sverdlin
On 25/03/15 18:43, Ioan Nicu wrote: Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when the necessary dependencies are not there yet. The driver core is already printing a message when a driver requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs without these error prints.

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-25 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "IN" == Ioan Nicu writes: IN> Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when IN> the necessary dependencies are not there yet. IN> The driver core is already printing a message when a driver IN> requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs IN> without these error

[PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-25 Thread Ioan Nicu
Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when the necessary dependencies are not there yet. The driver core is already printing a message when a driver requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs without these error prints. This patch changes the error messages from

[PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-25 Thread Ioan Nicu
Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when the necessary dependencies are not there yet. The driver core is already printing a message when a driver requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs without these error prints. This patch changes the error messages from

Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Change log level to debug for probe deferrals

2015-03-25 Thread Peter Korsgaard
IN == Ioan Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com writes: IN Probe deferral is not an error case. It happens only when IN the necessary dependencies are not there yet. IN The driver core is already printing a message when a driver IN requests probe deferral, so this can be traced in the logs IN without