Hi Joe,
2016-12-21 2:55 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 01:20 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have not got any comment, but does this seem
>> a right thing to do?
>
>> This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
>> typedef'ed, or the bit position o
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 01:20 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have not got any comment, but does this seem
> a right thing to do?
> This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
> typedef'ed, or the bit position of I2C_M_RD.
I think bool can be guaranteed to be _Bool.
Hi.
I have not got any comment, but does this seem
a right thing to do?
2016-10-19 13:38 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
> This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
> typedef'ed, or the bit position of I2C_M_RD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i
This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
typedef'ed, or the bit position of I2C_M_RD.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
4 matches
Mail list logo