Re: [PATCH] i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() (again)

2014-03-07 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 16:52, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Commit 028a690a1ebc8b "i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace()" > correctly removed the unneeded 'task != NULL' check because it would > be set to current if it was NULL. > > Commit 2bc5f927d489 "i386: split out dumpstack code

[PATCH] i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() (again)

2014-03-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
Commit 028a690a1ebc8b "i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace()" correctly removed the unneeded 'task != NULL' check because it would be set to current if it was NULL. Commit 2bc5f927d489 "i386: split out dumpstack code from traps_32.c" moved the code from traps_32.c to its own file

[PATCH] i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() (again)

2014-03-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
Commit 028a690a1ebc8b i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() correctly removed the unneeded 'task != NULL' check because it would be set to current if it was NULL. Commit 2bc5f927d489 i386: split out dumpstack code from traps_32.c moved the code from traps_32.c to its own file

Re: [PATCH] i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() (again)

2014-03-07 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 16:52, Steven Rostedt wrote: Commit 028a690a1ebc8b i386: Remove unneeded test of 'task' in dump_trace() correctly removed the unneeded 'task != NULL' check because it would be set to current if it was NULL. Commit 2bc5f927d489 i386: split out dumpstack code from