Re: [PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow

2014-11-14 Thread David Miller
From: Vincent Benayoun Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:04:57 + > From f25ff0f2645f9763552147d480f86973b7041e26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vincent BENAYOUN > Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:26 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow > > There

Re: [PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow

2014-11-14 Thread David Miller
: fixed signed integer overflow There could be a signed overflow in the following code. The expression, (32-logmask) is comprised between 0 and 31 included. It may be equal to 31. In such a case the left shift will produce a signed integer overflow. According to the C99 Standard

[PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow

2014-11-13 Thread Vincent Benayoun
>From f25ff0f2645f9763552147d480f86973b7041e26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent BENAYOUN Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow There could be a signed overflow in the following code. The expression, (32-logmask) is compri

[PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow

2014-11-13 Thread Vincent Benayoun
From f25ff0f2645f9763552147d480f86973b7041e26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent BENAYOUN vincent.benay...@trust-in-soft.com Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] inetdevice: fixed signed integer overflow There could be a signed overflow in the following code. The expression