Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
bool "All CPUs are build_forced no-CBs CPUs" > >> - depends on RCU_NOCB_CPU > >> help > >> This option forces all CPUs to be no-CBs CPUs. The rcu_nocbs= > >> boot parameter will be ignored. All CPUs' RCU callbacks will &

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Stefan Hengelein
CPUs to be no-CBs CPUs. The rcu_nocbs= >> boot parameter will be ignored. All CPUs' RCU callbacks will >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote: > Every choice item of the "Build-forced no-CBs CPUs" choice had a > dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice > itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. > The choice itself doesn't need to be

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote: Every choice item of the Build-forced no-CBs CPUs choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. The choice itself doesn't need to be

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Stefan Hengelein
:00 2001 From: Stefan Hengelein stefan.hengel...@fau.de Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:55:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice Every choice item of the Build-forced no-CBs CPUs choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-09-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
Sep 2014 19:55:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice Every choice item of the Build-forced no-CBs CPUs choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. The choice

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-08-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote: > Every choice item of the "Build-forced no-CBs CPUs" choice had a > dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice > itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. > The choice itself doesn't need to be

[PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-08-29 Thread Stefan Hengelein
Every choice item of the "Build-forced no-CBs CPUs" choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. The choice itself doesn't need to be visible if there are no items selectable (i.e. on arch/frv) or

[PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-08-29 Thread Stefan Hengelein
Every choice item of the Build-forced no-CBs CPUs choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. The choice itself doesn't need to be visible if there are no items selectable (i.e. on arch/frv) or RCU_NOCB_CPU

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: move RCU_NOCB_CPU dependencies to choice

2014-08-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote: Every choice item of the Build-forced no-CBs CPUs choice had a dependency to RCU_NOCB_CPU. It's more comprehensible if the choice itself has the dependency instead of every choice item. The choice itself doesn't need to be