On 17/07/07 19:02 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:48:46 +0200,
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM
On 17/07/07 17:40 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:48:46 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > > Introduce __init_exit, which
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> > > cleanup functions when they
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> > cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
>
> This is wrong.
> On arm (just one example
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
This is wrong.
On arm (just one example of several) the __exit section are discarded
at buildtime so any
On 17/07/07 10:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> > cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
> cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> include/linux/init.h |2 ++
> 1 file
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/init.h |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: work-powerpc.git/include/linux/init.h
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/init.h |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: work-powerpc.git/include/linux/init.h
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/init.h |2 ++
1 file changed, 2
On 17/07/07 10:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
This is wrong.
On arm (just one example of several) the __exit section are discarded
at buildtime so any reference
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in __init functions.
This is wrong.
On arm (just one example of
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie. for drivers that call
cleanup functions when they fail in
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Introduce __init_exit, which is useful ie.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:02:48AM
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:02:30 +0200,
Sam
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:48:46 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam
On 17/07/07 17:40 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai
On 17/07/07 19:02 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:48:46 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:32:36 +0200,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai
26 matches
Mail list logo