On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> FYI, It seems that Google does not like your email as I'm not
> receiving any of your messages in gmail. Some responses below:
That's odd. It works for me. Replied privately to try to sort this
out.
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 a
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>> This may already be apparent, but Dell sells two versions of the 9350:
>> one with the Broadcom adapter and one with the AC 8260.
>
> Off topic, for most readers: my version (with the AC
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> This may already be apparent, but Dell sells two versions of the 9350:
> one with the Broadcom adapter and one with the AC 8260.
Off topic, for most readers: my version (with the AC 8260) came with
Ubuntu preinstalled. Perhaps Chris' versio
Hi Luca,
FYI, It seems that Google does not like your email as I'm not
receiving any of your messages in gmail. Some responses below:
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 15:24 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, P
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:36 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 15:24 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Okay... Actually this is a structure in the BIOS and the actual method
> > we call is SPLC. The SPLC method may return one item from this table,
> > or something entirely different, pos
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 15:24 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Okay... Actually this is a structure in the BIOS and the actual method
> we call is SPLC. The SPLC method may return one item from this table,
> or something entirely different, possible one of the three values
> depending on a configuration
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 23:32 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > For what it's worth, on my machine I have twenty (!) SPLX entries, all
> > reading:
> > Name (SPLX, Package (0x04)
> > {
> > Zero,
> > Package (0x03)
> >
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
> > > tables. Can you tell us which platform you are using?
>
>
> Interesting. I'm running a Dell XP
Luca,
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 09:11 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> By "platform" I meant the PC you are using. The ACPI table is created
> by the OEM, so different PCs have different tables.
Like Chris I use a Dell XPS 13 (9350), but mine came with an AC 8260
out of it's assembly plant:
Detected
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 12:11 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:02 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 02:19 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> > This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
> > tables. Can you tell us which platform you
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> For what it's worth, on my machine I have twenty (!) SPLX entries, all
> reading:
> Name (SPLX, Package (0x04)
> {
> Zero,
> Package (0x03)
> {
> 0x8000,
> 0x8000,
> 0x8
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> I didn't receive your email so I'll try to respond via Paul's.
>>> If this is really bothering you, I guess I could apply this patch for
>>> now. But as I said, this is not solving the actual problem.
>>
>> Bikeshedding: I think IWL_INFO()
Hi Luca,
I didn't receive your email so I'll try to respond via Paul's.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
>> tables. Can you tell us which platform you are using?
Interesting. I'm running a Dell XPS 13 93
Hi Luca,
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:02 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 02:19 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
> tables. Can you tell us which platform you are using?
On my machine I'm seeing the same error as Chris
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 02:19 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> Commit bcb079a14d75 ("iwlwifi: pcie: retrieve and parse ACPI power
> limitations") looks for a specific structure in the ACPI tables for
> setting the default power limit. The data returned for at least some
> dual band chipsets is not
Commit bcb079a14d75 ("iwlwifi: pcie: retrieve and parse ACPI power
limitations") looks for a specific structure in the ACPI tables for
setting the default power limit. The data returned for at least some
dual band chipsets is not recognized, though. For example, the AC 8260
reports the following:
16 matches
Mail list logo
