On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:59:08PM -0800, David Riley wrote:
> test_udelay had a tolerance of udelay() being up to 0.5% fast but
> that tolerance is insufficient for some platforms. For ARM, the error
> is around 0.7% so increase the test to allow for up to 1% which was
> previously described as
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:59:08PM -0800, David Riley wrote:
> test_udelay had a tolerance of udelay() being up to 0.5% fast but
> that tolerance is insufficient for some platforms. For ARM, the error
> is around 0.7% so increase the test to allow for up to 1% which was
> previously described as
test_udelay had a tolerance of udelay() being up to 0.5% fast but
that tolerance is insufficient for some platforms. For ARM, the error
is around 0.7% so increase the test to allow for up to 1% which was
previously described as being acceptable for udelay().
See the following thread for more
test_udelay had a tolerance of udelay() being up to 0.5% fast but
that tolerance is insufficient for some platforms. For ARM, the error
is around 0.7% so increase the test to allow for up to 1% which was
previously described as being acceptable for udelay().
See the following thread for more
4 matches
Mail list logo
