On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:33:46PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> >> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
> >> the child (in
[Fixed the linux-pci mailing list address]
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>>> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
>>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
>> the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
>> reference to the child goes away, both child
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
> the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
> reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
> shall be released. However, currently the
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
> the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
> reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
> shall be released. However, currently the
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
reference to the child goes away, both child and its parents
shall be released. However, currently the resources of parent
get released first, followed by the child's
[Fixed the linux-pci mailing list address]
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>>> If the only remaining
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
>> the child (in kobject_add_internal()), then when the last
>> reference to the
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:33:46PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:02:46AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> >> If the only remaining reference to a parent, is the one taken by
> >> the
14 matches
Mail list logo