On 23/02/2018 16:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I can see this warnings as well and yes, kvm_arch_irq_routing_update seems to
> be available
> for CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD=y and =n.
> Seems that irqchip.c is compile independly from CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD,
>
> so
>
> Acked-by: Christian
On 23/02/2018 16:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I can see this warnings as well and yes, kvm_arch_irq_routing_update seems to
> be available
> for CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD=y and =n.
> Seems that irqchip.c is compile independly from CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD,
>
> so
>
> Acked-by: Christian
I can see this warnings as well and yes, kvm_arch_irq_routing_update seems to
be available
for CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD=y and =n.
Seems that irqchip.c is compile independly from CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD,
so
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
On 02/22/2018 01:05 PM,
I can see this warnings as well and yes, kvm_arch_irq_routing_update seems to
be available
for CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD=y and =n.
Seems that irqchip.c is compile independly from CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD,
so
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
On 02/22/2018 01:05 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Move the
Move the kvm_arch_irq_routing_update() prototype outside of
ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD guards to fix the following sparse warning:
arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/irqchip.c:171:28: warning: symbol
'kvm_arch_irq_routing_update' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Sebastian
Move the kvm_arch_irq_routing_update() prototype outside of
ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD guards to fix the following sparse warning:
arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/irqchip.c:171:28: warning: symbol
'kvm_arch_irq_routing_update' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Sebastian
6 matches
Mail list logo