On Friday March 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>> + conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks;
> >>>
> Will the (real) fix be in 2.6.21?
It is now in Linus' git tree, so yes.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Friday March 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks;
Will the (real) fix be in 2.6.21?
It is now in Linus' git tree, so yes.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday March 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf->raid_disks-1);
+ conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
ahem.
Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday March 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf-raid_disks-1);
+ conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
ahem.
On Thursday March 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf->raid_disks-1);
> > + conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
>
> ahem.
It wasn't like that when I
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf->raid_disks-1);
> + conf->expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
ahem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
### Comments for Changeset
Recent patch for raid6 reshape had a change missing that showed up in
subsequent review.
Many places in the raid5 code used "conf->raid_disks-1" to mean
"number of data disks". With raid6 that had to be changed to
"conf->raid_disk - conf->max_degraded" or similar.
### Comments for Changeset
Recent patch for raid6 reshape had a change missing that showed up in
subsequent review.
Many places in the raid5 code used conf-raid_disks-1 to mean
number of data disks. With raid6 that had to be changed to
conf-raid_disk - conf-max_degraded or similar. One place
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf-raid_disks-1);
+ conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
ahem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Thursday March 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:56:55 +1100 NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i)*(conf-raid_disks-1);
+ conf-expand_progress = (sector_nr + i) * new_data_disks);
ahem.
It wasn't like that when I tested it,
10 matches
Mail list logo