Re: [PATCH] md: zero the original position of sb for 0.90 and 1.0

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:18:39PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote: > For sb version 0.90 and 1.0 which locates after data, when we increase > the spindle volume size and grow the raid arry size, the older sb which is > different between spindles will be left there. Due to this left sb, the > spindle

Re: [PATCH] md: zero the original position of sb for 0.90 and 1.0

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:18:39PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote: > For sb version 0.90 and 1.0 which locates after data, when we increase > the spindle volume size and grow the raid arry size, the older sb which is > different between spindles will be left there. Due to this left sb, the > spindle

[PATCH] md: zero the original position of sb for 0.90 and 1.0

For sb version 0.90 and 1.0 which locates after data, when we increase the spindle volume size and grow the raid arry size, the older sb which is different between spindles will be left there. Due to this left sb, the spindle volume cannot be grown with zero filled part with --asume-clean.

[PATCH] md: zero the original position of sb for 0.90 and 1.0

For sb version 0.90 and 1.0 which locates after data, when we increase the spindle volume size and grow the raid arry size, the older sb which is different between spindles will be left there. Due to this left sb, the spindle volume cannot be grown with zero filled part with --asume-clean.