Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) thread

2014-05-30 Thread Kamil Iskra
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 21:45:41 -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > The user could also mark more than > > one thread in this way - in which case the kernel will pick > > the first one it sees (is that oldest, or newest?) that is marked. > > Not sure if this would ever be useful unless you want to

Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) thread

2014-05-29 Thread Tony Luck
> OK, I'll take this. If you didn't already apply it, then add a "Reviewed-by: Tony Luck " I see that this patch is on top of my earlier ones (includes the "force_early" argument). That means you have both of those queued too? Thanks -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) thread

2014-05-28 Thread Tony Luck
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > Could you take a look? It looks good - and should be a workable API for application writers to use. > @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ PR_MCE_KILL > PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY: Early kill > PR_MCE_KILL_LATE: Late kill >