On 11/26/18 3:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +0800, Yang Yang wrote:
>> When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
>> into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
>> would like to do that), there is no need to
On 11/26/18 3:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +0800, Yang Yang wrote:
>> When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
>> into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
>> would like to do that), there is no need to
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +0800, Yang Yang wrote:
> When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
> into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
> would like to do that), there is no need to consider it.
I don't understand this patch. The
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:58:23AM +0800, Yang Yang wrote:
> When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
> into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
> would like to do that), there is no need to consider it.
I don't understand this patch. The
When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
would like to do that), there is no need to consider it.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1
When si_mem_available() calculates 'available', it takes SWAP
into account. But if CONFIG_SWAP is N or SWAP is off(some embedded system
would like to do that), there is no need to consider it.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1
6 matches
Mail list logo