Re: [PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-28 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:22:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: > > commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") > > and > > commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") > > The latter adds

Re: [PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-28 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:22:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: > > commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") > > and > > commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") > > The latter adds

Re: [PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-27 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:22:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: > > commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") > > and > > commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") > > The latter adds

Re: [PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-27 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:22:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: > > commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") > > and > > commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") > > The latter adds

[PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-27 Thread Kees Cook
A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") and commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") The latter adds incorrect wrapping around the existing s390 section, and came later. I'd prefer

[PATCH] mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

2017-03-27 Thread Kees Cook
A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both: commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support") and commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init") The latter adds incorrect wrapping around the existing s390 section, and came later. I'd prefer