On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:22:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
>
> commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
>
> and
>
> commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
>
> The latter adds
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:22:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
>
> commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
>
> and
>
> commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
>
> The latter adds
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:22:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
>
> commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
>
> and
>
> commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
>
> The latter adds
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:22:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
>
> commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
>
> and
>
> commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
>
> The latter adds
A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
and
commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
The latter adds incorrect wrapping around the existing s390 section,
and came later. I'd prefer
A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:
commit d07a980c1b8d ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")
and
commit d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
The latter adds incorrect wrapping around the existing s390 section,
and came later. I'd prefer
6 matches
Mail list logo