On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Yangtao Li wrote:
> We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
> is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
> the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
> does the locking properly.So there
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Yangtao Li wrote:
> We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
> is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
> the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
> does the locking properly.So there
On Thu 08-11-18 12:48:56, Yangtao Li wrote:
> We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
> is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
> the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
> does the locking properly.So
On Thu 08-11-18 12:48:56, Yangtao Li wrote:
> We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
> is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
> the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
> does the locking properly.So
We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
does the locking properly.So there is no need to use this function.
We should get rid of this function. It no longer serves its purpose.This
is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk was called outside of
the core mm.We do have a proper abstraction in vm_brk_flags and that one
does the locking properly.So there is no need to use this function.
6 matches
Mail list logo