Hi Michal,
On 04/09/2013 06:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 09-04-13 18:05:30, Simon Jeons wrote:
[...]
I try this in v3.9-rc5:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1MB
14813+0 records in
14812+0 records out
1481200 bytes (15 GB) copied, 105.988 s, 140 MB/s
free -m -s 1
tota
Hi Michal,
On 04/09/2013 06:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 09-04-13 18:05:30, Simon Jeons wrote:
[...]
I try this in v3.9-rc5:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1MB
14813+0 records in
14812+0 records out
1481200 bytes (15 GB) copied, 105.988 s, 140 MB/s
free -m -s 1
tota
On Tue 09-04-13 18:05:30, Simon Jeons wrote:
[...]
> >I try this in v3.9-rc5:
> >dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1MB
> >14813+0 records in
> >14812+0 records out
> >1481200 bytes (15 GB) copied, 105.988 s, 140 MB/s
> >
> >free -m -s 1
> >
> > total used free sha
Hi Michal,
On 04/05/2013 02:31 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 03/21/2013 04:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was ena
Ping!
On 04/05/2013 02:31 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 03/21/2013 04:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was enabled
Hi Michal,
On 03/21/2013 04:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
kerne
On Thu 21-03-13 16:32:03, Simon Jeons wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> On 03/21/2013 04:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
> >>Hi Mel,
> >>On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>>The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
> >>>zone_recl
Hi Michal,
On 03/21/2013 04:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
kerne
On Thu 21-03-13 10:33:07, Simon Jeons wrote:
> Hi Mel,
> On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
> >zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
> >kernel. The reproduction case was as follows
> >
>
Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
kernel. The reproduction case was as follows
1. Run numactl -m +0 dd if=largefile of=/dev/null
This al
On Wed 20-03-13 18:19:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
> zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
> kernel. The reproduction case was as follows
>
> 1. Run numactl -m +0 dd if=largefile of=/dev/null
>This
The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
kernel. The reproduction case was as follows
1. Run numactl -m +0 dd if=largefile of=/dev/null
This allocates a large number of clean pages in node 0
2. n
12 matches
Mail list logo