On 12/02/2017 02:19 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
>
> Maybe that should be up
On 12/02/2017 02:19 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
>
> Maybe that should be up front rather than
On 12/02/2017 02:19 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
MAP_FIXED has been widely used
On 12/02/2017 02:19 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
> >> page still
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
> >> page still claims that "the use
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
>> page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
>
> I think
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
>> page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
>
> I think we should continue to
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
> page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
I think we should continue to discourage the use of this option, but
I'm going to include
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:16:26PM -0800, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
> page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
I think we should continue to discourage the use of this option, but
I'm going to include
From: John Hubbard
MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
The documentation assumes that "less portable" == "must be discouraged".
Instead of discouraging something that is so useful
From: John Hubbard
MAP_FIXED has been widely used for a very long time, yet the man
page still claims that "the use of this option is discouraged".
The documentation assumes that "less portable" == "must be discouraged".
Instead of discouraging something that is so useful and widely used,
12 matches
Mail list logo