Re: [PATCH] nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart

2017-02-16 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Frederic, [auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core] [cannot apply to v4.10-rc8 next-20170216] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Frederic-Weisbecker/nohz-Fix-possible-missing-clo

Re: [PATCH] nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart

2017-02-16 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Frederic, [auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core] [cannot apply to v4.10-rc8 next-20170216] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Frederic-Weisbecker/nohz-Fix-possible-missing-clo

Re: [PATCH] nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart

2017-02-07 Thread Wanpeng Li
2017-02-08 0:44 GMT+08:00 Frederic Weisbecker : > ts->next_tick keeps track of the next tick deadline in order to optimize > clock programmation on irq exit and avoid redundant clock device writes. > > Now if ts->next_tick missed an update, we may spuriously miss a clock > reprog later as the nohz

Re: [PATCH] nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart

2017-02-07 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:44 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > ts->next_tick keeps track of the next tick deadline in order to > optimize > clock programmation on irq exit and avoid redundant clock device > writes. > > Now if ts->next_tick missed an update, we may spuriously miss a clock > reprog

[PATCH] nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart

2017-02-07 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
ts->next_tick keeps track of the next tick deadline in order to optimize clock programmation on irq exit and avoid redundant clock device writes. Now if ts->next_tick missed an update, we may spuriously miss a clock reprog later as the nohz code is fooled by an obsolete next_tick value. This is w