On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, David L. Parsley wrote: > > Yup, I backed out Adam's one-liner in favor of the attached one-liner. > Tested on 2.4.0, but should patch cleanly to just about anything. ;-) > > BTW Linus - you were of course right on the cramfs wanting 4096 > blocksize... but without this fix, that doesn't matter much. ;-) So everything works the way you want it now? Just checking that there aren't any outstanding issues.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs mem... Christoph Rohland
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory ... Alan Cox
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs mem... Christoph Rohland
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruptio... David L. Parsley
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corru... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix David Woodhouse
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fi... Shane Nay
- Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fi... David Woodhouse
- [PATCH] one-liner fix for bforget() honoring BH_Pro... David L. Parsley
- Linus Torvalds