On 2015/4/2 16:12, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:04:52AM +, Wang Nan wrote:
>> There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
>> '-i'/'--input' option:
>>
>> # perf record ls
>>[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>>[ perf record:
On 2015/4/2 16:12, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:04:52AM +, Wang Nan wrote:
There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
'-i'/'--input' option:
# perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:04:52AM +, Wang Nan wrote:
> There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
> '-i'/'--input' option:
>
> # perf record ls
>[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (8
There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
'-i'/'--input' option:
# perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (8 samples) ]
# mv ./perf.data ./perf.data.new
# perf annotate -i
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:04:52AM +, Wang Nan wrote:
There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
'-i'/'--input' option:
# perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (8 samples) ]
There is a bug in perf annotate that it doesn't respect user provided
'-i'/'--input' option:
# perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (8 samples) ]
# mv ./perf.data ./perf.data.new
# perf annotate -i
6 matches
Mail list logo