Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > other than that LGTM and long over due.
> > > Acked-by: David Ahern
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > other than that LGTM and long over due.
> > > Acked-by: David Ahern
> > We
On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> > > perf command. If the suffix
On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> > > perf command. If the suffix
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
> > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> > -
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
> > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> > -
On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
> was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that
> got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g.
On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
> perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
> was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that
> got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g.
Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that
got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g. the case for
appimages (e.g.
Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal
perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution
was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that
got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g. the case for
appimages (e.g.
10 matches
Mail list logo