Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > > > other than that LGTM and long over due. > > > Acked-by: David Ahern

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > > > other than that LGTM and long over due. > > > Acked-by: David Ahern > > We

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Milian Wolff
On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > > > perf command. If the suffix

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Milian Wolff
On Monday, September 11, 2017 4:33:12 PM CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > > > perf command. If the suffix

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution > > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c > > -

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:08:18AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution > > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c > > -

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread David Ahern
On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution > was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that > got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g.

Re: [PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread David Ahern
On 9/11/17 4:14 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal > perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution > was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that > got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g.

[PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Milian Wolff
Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g. the case for appimages (e.g.

[PATCH] perf: support running perf binaries with a dash in their name

2017-09-11 Thread Milian Wolff
Previously the part behind "perf-" was interpreted as an internal perf command. If the suffix could not be handled, the execution was stopped. This makes it impossible to launch perf binaries that got renamed to have the `perf-` prefix. This is e.g. the case for appimages (e.g.