I am getting the following warning when I build kernel 4.9-git on my
PowerBook G4 with a 32-bit PPC processor:
AS arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.o
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S:299:7: warning: "CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE" is not defined
[-Wundef]
This problem is evident after commit 989cea5c14be
I am getting the following warning when I build kernel 4.9-git on my
PowerBook G4 with a 32-bit PPC processor:
AS arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.o
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S:299:7: warning: "CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE" is not defined
[-Wundef]
This problem is evident after commit 989cea5c14be
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean to get
> approval
> from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning. I
> don't
> really have time for that. Let's just forget about it and live with
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean to get
approval
from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning. I
don't
really have time for that. Let's just forget about it
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 23:01 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I thought that only happens if a const is dropped, but maybe not.
>
> Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean
> to get approval
> from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning.
> I don't
On 06/23/2014 10:34 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
On 06/23/2014 10:34 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 23:01 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
I thought that only happens if a const is dropped, but maybe not.
Sigh. Much easier to break something than to fix it. That would mean
to get approval
from at least three maintainers, and all that to get rid of a warning.
I don't
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
> >>
> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18:
On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
> type qualifiers ignored on function return type
> static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
> ^
>
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
^
This
On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:38 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type
On 06/16/2014 06:25 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
> type qualifiers ignored on function return type
> static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
> ^
>
> This is
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
^
This is caused by
On 06/16/2014 06:25 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
^
This is caused by a function returning 'const int', which doesn't
If compiled with W=1, the following warning is seen in powerpc builds.
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:750:18: warning:
type qualifiers ignored on function return type
static const int powerpc_smt_flags(void)
^
This is caused by a function returning 'const int', which doesn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
