On 04/08/2013 06:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:24:22PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>
>> 0) This patch ended up as mainline commit
>> bc8ce4afd7ee7e1421c935d24b1f879f82afdd4e, which is part of
>> v3.9-rc6.
>
> Numbering your paragraphs and using full commit IDs like this
> do
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:24:22PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) This patch ended up as mainline commit
> bc8ce4afd7ee7e1421c935d24b1f879f82afdd4e, which is part of v3.9-rc6.
Numbering your paragraphs and using full commit IDs like this doesn't
help with legibility...
> 2) The following (draft)
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 20:09 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:02:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > _regmap_raw_write() contains code to call regcache_write() to write
> > values to the cache. That code calls memcpy() to copy the value data to
> > the start of the work_buf. H
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:02:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> _regmap_raw_write() contains code to call regcache_write() to write
> values to the cache. That code calls memcpy() to copy the value data to
> the start of the work_buf. However, at least when _regmap_raw_
From: Stephen Warren
_regmap_raw_write() contains code to call regcache_write() to write
values to the cache. That code calls memcpy() to copy the value data to
the start of the work_buf. However, at least when _regmap_raw_write() is
called from _regmap_bus_raw_write(), the value data is in the w
5 matches
Mail list logo