On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:57:32PM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: John Kacur
> > But please in the future
> > 1. Don't cc lkml on this
> > 2. Include the maintainers in your patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the sign-off. I was following
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 23:57:32 [+0200], John Kacur wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: John Kacur
>
> Hmmm. I remember this thing came up years ago in the Debian BTS and then
> that backfire module got removed from the Debian package because there
> was
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:15:46AM +0200, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:57:32PM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: John Kacur
> > But please in the future
> > 1. Don't cc lkml on this
> > 2. Include the maintainers in your patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the
On 2019-09-16 23:57:32 [+0200], John Kacur wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur
Hmmm. I remember this thing came up years ago in the Debian BTS and then
that backfire module got removed from the Debian package because there
was no need for it.
Just to clarify: is there any need to keep this module
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:57:32PM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur
> But please in the future
> 1. Don't cc lkml on this
> 2. Include the maintainers in your patch
Hi,
Thanks for the sign-off. I was following the instructions listed here:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> From: Sultan Alsawaf
>
> Architecture-specific uaccess.h headers can have dependencies on
> linux/uaccess.h (i.e., VERIFY_WRITE), so it cannot be included directly.
> Since linux/uaccess.h includes asm/uaccess.h, just do that instead.
>
> This
From: Sultan Alsawaf
Architecture-specific uaccess.h headers can have dependencies on
linux/uaccess.h (i.e., VERIFY_WRITE), so it cannot be included directly.
Since linux/uaccess.h includes asm/uaccess.h, just do that instead.
This fixes compile errors with certain kernels and architectures.
7 matches
Mail list logo