On 21.8.2017 10:46, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed, I will not apply that patch and instead will push for:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9911471/
no problem with this.
M
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 21.8.2017 10:46, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed, I will not apply that patch and instead will push for:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9911471/
no problem with this.
M
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
As discussed, I will not apply that patch and instead will push for:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9911471/
On 19/07/2017 at 13:39:57 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> The patch:
> "timers: Introduce in-kernel alarm-timer interface"
> (sha1: ff3ead96d17f47ee70c294a5cc2cce9b61e82f0f)
>
Hi,
As discussed, I will not apply that patch and instead will push for:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9911471/
On 19/07/2017 at 13:39:57 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> The patch:
> "timers: Introduce in-kernel alarm-timer interface"
> (sha1: ff3ead96d17f47ee70c294a5cc2cce9b61e82f0f)
>
The patch:
"timers: Introduce in-kernel alarm-timer interface"
(sha1: ff3ead96d17f47ee70c294a5cc2cce9b61e82f0f)
introduced new requirement that RTC drivers with alarm functionality
can't be used as a module.
When module is unloaded there is still a reference that's why
rtc_device_release() is not
The patch:
"timers: Introduce in-kernel alarm-timer interface"
(sha1: ff3ead96d17f47ee70c294a5cc2cce9b61e82f0f)
introduced new requirement that RTC drivers with alarm functionality
can't be used as a module.
When module is unloaded there is still a reference that's why
rtc_device_release() is not
6 matches
Mail list logo