Hi Peter,
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:53:25AM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > pet...@infradead.org writes:
>> >
>> > > After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:53:25AM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > pet...@infradead.org writes:
> >
> > > After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
> > > lock tracepoints are visible to
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:53:25AM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> pet...@infradead.org writes:
>
> > After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
> > lock tracepoints are visible to lockdep and RCU-lockdep is finding a
> > bunch more RCU violations that were
Hi Peter,
pet...@infradead.org writes:
> After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
> lock tracepoints are visible to lockdep and RCU-lockdep is finding a
> bunch more RCU violations that were previously hidden.
>
> Switch the idle->seqcount over to using raw_write_*()
After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
lock tracepoints are visible to lockdep and RCU-lockdep is finding a
bunch more RCU violations that were previously hidden.
Switch the idle->seqcount over to using raw_write_*() to avoid the
lockdep annotation and thus the lock
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 03:30:31PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
>
> After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
> lock tracepoints are visible to lockdep and RCU-lockdep is finding a
> bunch more RCU violations that were previously hidden.
>
> Switch the
6 matches
Mail list logo