* Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
>
> I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
>
> Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
>
>
> The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
> "do not leak PI boosting
* Dmitry Adamushko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
> >
> > I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
>
> thanks!
>
> >
> > Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
> >
> >
> > The adjusting
On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
>
> I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
thanks!
>
> Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
>
>
> The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
> "do not leak PI
Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
"do not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork().
This patch moves the adjusting
Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
do not leak PI boosting priority to the child at the sched_fork().
This patch moves the adjusting
On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
thanks!
Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
do not leak PI boosting
* Dmitry Adamushko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
thanks!
Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
The adjusting sched_class is a
* Hiroshi Shimamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
do not leak PI boosting priority to the
8 matches
Mail list logo