Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
On 3/2/21 11:52 PM, Jiapeng Chong wrote: Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:735:35-37: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong Acked-by: Yonghong Song
[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:735:35-37: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c index 427ca00..eefd445 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt) * socket is not a valid test. So in this case lets not * enable kTLS but still run the test. */ - if (!txmsg_redir || (txmsg_redir && txmsg_ingress)) { + if (!txmsg_redir || txmsg_ingress) { err = sockmap_init_ktls(opt->verbose, rx_fd); if (err) return err; -- 1.8.3.1
[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:954:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:932:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:909:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c index 99ea6cf..f4a96d5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate(void *arg) ksft_print_msg("Destroying socket\n"); } - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || bidi_pass) { xsk_socket__delete(ifobject->xsk->xsk); (void)xsk_umem__delete(ifobject->umem->umem); } @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) pthread_mutex_lock(_mutex); /*Spawn RX thread */ - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, ifdict[1])) exit_with_error(errno); } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex); /*Spawn TX thread */ - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, ifdict[0])) exit_with_error(errno); } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { -- 1.8.3.1
Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:27 PM Jiapeng Chong wrote: > > Fix the following coccicheck warnings: > > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:954:28-30: WARNING !A || A && > B is equivalent to !A || B. > > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:932:28-30: WARNING !A || A && > B is equivalent to !A || B. > > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:909:28-30: WARNING !A || A && > B is equivalent to !A || B. > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong > --- This doesn't apply cleanly onto bpf-next anymore. Please rebase and re-submit. Make sure to include [PATCH bpf-next] prefix in your email subject. Thanks! > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c > index 1e722ee..98ad4a2 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c > @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate(void *arg) > ksft_print_msg("Destroying socket\n"); > } > > - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && bidi_pass)) { > + if (!opt_bidi || bidi_pass) { > xsk_socket__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->xsk->xsk); > (void)xsk_umem__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->umem->umem); > } > @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) > pthread_mutex_lock(_mutex); > > /*Spawn RX thread */ > - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { > + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { > if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, (void > *)ifdict[1])) > exit_with_error(errno); > } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { > @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) > pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex); > > /*Spawn TX thread */ > - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { > + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { > if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, (void > *)ifdict[0])) > exit_with_error(errno); > } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { > -- > 1.8.3.1 >
[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:954:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:932:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:909:28-30: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c index 1e722ee..98ad4a2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate(void *arg) ksft_print_msg("Destroying socket\n"); } - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || bidi_pass) { xsk_socket__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->xsk->xsk); (void)xsk_umem__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->umem->umem); } @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) pthread_mutex_lock(_mutex); /*Spawn RX thread */ - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, (void *)ifdict[1])) exit_with_error(errno); } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void) pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex); /*Spawn TX thread */ - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) { + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) { if (pthread_create(, , worker_testapp_validate, (void *)ifdict[0])) exit_with_error(errno); } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) { -- 1.8.3.1