Re: [PATCH] signal: annotate implicit fall through

2019-04-01 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
[+cc Andrew] On 3/13/19 3:27 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > ping ? > Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Maybe Andrew can take this? Thanks -- Gustavo > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:35 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and >> this

Re: [PATCH] signal: annotate implicit fall through

2019-03-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
ping ? On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:35 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and > this place in the code produced a warning (W=1). > > This commit remove the following warning: > > kernel/signal.c:795:13: warning: this statement may fall

[PATCH] signal: annotate implicit fall through

2019-01-14 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and this place in the code produced a warning (W=1). This commit remove the following warning: kernel/signal.c:795:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre ---