On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
> > moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
> > defrag easier.
>
> I
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
defrag easier.
I think it's
On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
> moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
> defrag easier.
I think it's CONFIG_PROC_FS without CONFIG_SYSFS.
--
To
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Pekka, i stuck your patch into the x86.git random-test-grid, and it
> found the following build error after a few iterations:
>
> mm/slub.c: In function 's_show':
> mm/slub.c:4188: error: implicit declaration of function 'count_partial'
>
> find
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Pekka, i stuck your patch into the x86.git random-test-grid, and it
found the following build error after a few iterations:
mm/slub.c: In function 's_show':
mm/slub.c:4188: error: implicit declaration of function 'count_partial'
find the
On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
defrag easier.
I think it's CONFIG_PROC_FS without CONFIG_SYSFS.
--
To
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:40 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ah, didnt see that. Could you pick up bits of my patch because it seems
> to do a better job, such as proper c99 initializer:
[snip]
> also, my patch fixes all the warnings as well, not just the errors. So
> please give
* Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Dec 22, 2007 3:14 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also please apply the cleanup patch below, it fixes 34 checkpatch errors
> > and warnings in mm/slub.c.
>
> Those are already fixed in -mm:
>
>
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:37 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pekka, i stuck your patch into the x86.git random-test-grid, and it
> found the following build error after a few iterations:
>
> mm/slub.c: In function 's_show':
> mm/slub.c:4188: error: implicit declaration of
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
> > SLAB for SLUB.
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pekka, i stuck your
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:14 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also please apply the cleanup patch below, it fixes 34 checkpatch errors
> and warnings in mm/slub.c.
Those are already fixed in -mm:
* Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
> SLAB for SLUB.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe
* Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
> SLAB for SLUB.
cool :-) I tried your patch and slabtop works just fine:
-->
Active / Total Objects (% used):
From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with SLAB for
SLUB.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Pekka
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with SLAB for
SLUB.
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg
* Pekka J Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
SLAB for SLUB.
cool :-) I tried your patch and slabtop works just fine:
--
Active / Total Objects (% used): 31939 /
* Pekka J Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
SLAB for SLUB.
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:14 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also please apply the cleanup patch below, it fixes 34 checkpatch errors
and warnings in mm/slub.c.
Those are already fixed in -mm:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file that is ABI compatible with
SLAB for SLUB.
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pekka, i stuck your patch into the
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:37 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pekka, i stuck your patch into the x86.git random-test-grid, and it
found the following build error after a few iterations:
mm/slub.c: In function 's_show':
mm/slub.c:4188: error: implicit declaration of function
* Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:14 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also please apply the cleanup patch below, it fixes 34 checkpatch errors
and warnings in mm/slub.c.
Those are already fixed in -mm:
Hi Ingo,
On Dec 22, 2007 3:40 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, didnt see that. Could you pick up bits of my patch because it seems
to do a better job, such as proper c99 initializer:
[snip]
also, my patch fixes all the warnings as well, not just the errors. So
please give it a
22 matches
Mail list logo
