Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

2007-10-28 Thread Olof Johansson
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:24:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That was already fixed AFAICT. > > Not in Linus' tree, yet. Nope, it's still sitting in -mm. Al Viro just posted the same fix too.

Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

2007-10-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That was already fixed AFAICT. Not in Linus' tree, yet. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpttYSDYSayZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

2007-10-28 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > so shouldn't be passed to atomic_read. That was already fixed AFAICT. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-inf

[PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

2007-10-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
so shouldn't be passed to atomic_read. mm/slub.c: In function 'slab_mem_offline_callback': mm/slub.c:2737: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atomic_read' from incompatible pointer type mm/slub.c:2737: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atomic_read' from incompatible pointer type mm/slub.c:2737: warni