On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> 2012/7/28 Christoph Lameter :
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> >> Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
> >
> > That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
> > clearer expression.
> >
> >> @@ -2490,25
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
2012/7/28 Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
clearer expression.
@@ -2490,25 +2492,17
2012/7/28 Christoph Lameter :
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
>
> That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
> clearer expression.
>
>> @@ -2490,25 +2492,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
2012/7/28 Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
clearer expression.
@@ -2490,25 +2492,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
clearer expression.
> @@ -2490,25 +2492,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
> page *page,
>
When we try to free object, there is some of case that we need
to take a node lock. This is the necessary step for preventing a race.
After taking a lock, then we try to cmpxchg_double_slab().
But, there is a possible scenario that cmpxchg_double_slab() is failed.
Following example explains this.
When we try to free object, there is some of case that we need
to take a node lock. This is the necessary step for preventing a race.
After taking a lock, then we try to cmpxchg_double_slab().
But, there is a possible scenario that cmpxchg_double_slab() is failed.
Following example explains this.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Subject and commit log are changed from v1.
That looks a bit better. But the changelog could use more cleanup and
clearer expression.
@@ -2490,25 +2492,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct
page *page,
return;
8 matches
Mail list logo