Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fb_watterott: fix usleep_range is preferred over udelay

On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 12:32:44PM +0200, Hassan Shahbazi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 07:39:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:20:10AM +0200, Hassan Shahbazi wrote: > > > Fix the checkpath.pl issue on fb_watterott.c. write_vmem and > > > write_vmem_8bit functions are

Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fb_watterott: fix usleep_range is preferred over udelay

On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 07:39:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:20:10AM +0200, Hassan Shahbazi wrote: > > Fix the checkpath.pl issue on fb_watterott.c. write_vmem and > > write_vmem_8bit functions are within non-atomic context and can > > safely use usleep_range. > > see

Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fb_watterott: fix usleep_range is preferred over udelay

On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:20:10AM +0200, Hassan Shahbazi wrote: > Fix the checkpath.pl issue on fb_watterott.c. write_vmem and > write_vmem_8bit functions are within non-atomic context and can > safely use usleep_range. > see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt > > Signed-off-by: Hassan

[PATCH] staging: fbtft: fb_watterott: fix usleep_range is preferred over udelay

Fix the checkpath.pl issue on fb_watterott.c. write_vmem and write_vmem_8bit functions are within non-atomic context and can safely use usleep_range. see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt Signed-off-by: Hassan Shahbazi --- drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_watterott.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2