From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>

Using list_move() instead of list_del() + list_add().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c 
b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
index 824b852..e401b49 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
@@ -836,8 +836,7 @@ int wl_tx( struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, int 
port )
         txF->frame.port = port;
         /* Move the frame to the txQ */
         /* NOTE: Here's where we would do priority queueing */
-        list_del( &( txF->node ));
-        list_add( &( txF->node ), &( lp->txQ[0] ));
+        list_move(&(txF->node), &(lp->txQ[0]));
 
         lp->txQ_count++;
         if( lp->txQ_count >= DEFAULT_NUM_TX_FRAMES ) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to