Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 04.05.01:
> In message <01050413055100.00907@golmepha> you write:
> > Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> > > There are two cases where the substitution is problematic:
> >
> > Yes, but...
> >
> > The cases which my patch modifies
In message <01050413055100.00907@golmepha> you write:
> Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> > There are two cases where the substitution is problematic:
>
> Yes, but...
>
> The cases which my patch modifies are of a different kind:
The very first hunk of your patch is
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> In message <01050120580701.01713@golmepha> you write:
> > Hello,
Hi!
> >
> > the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
> > very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
> > but I
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
In message 01050120580701.01713@golmepha you write:
Hello,
Hi!
the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
but I trust you can
In message 01050413055100.00907@golmepha you write:
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
There are two cases where the substitution is problematic:
Yes, but...
The cases which my patch modifies are of a different kind:
The very first hunk of your patch is wrong. I
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 04.05.01:
In message 01050413055100.00907@golmepha you write:
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
There are two cases where the substitution is problematic:
Yes, but...
The cases which my patch modifies are of a
In message <01050120580701.01713@golmepha> you write:
> Hello,
>
> the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
> very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
> but I trust you can digest it nevertheless. It's made against kernel
> version
In message 01050120580701.01713@golmepha you write:
Hello,
the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
but I trust you can digest it nevertheless. It's made against kernel
version 2.4.4.
Hello,
the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
but I trust you can digest it nevertheless. It's made against kernel
version 2.4.4.
What is the benefit of getting rid of strtok? It is for
Hello,
the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
but I trust you can digest it nevertheless. It's made against kernel
version 2.4.4.
What is the benefit of getting rid of strtok? It is for
10 matches
Mail list logo
