Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 08:07:25PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2015 19:44:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe
On Monday 06 July 2015 19:44:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > This patch adds removable mass storage
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget
> > > (for N900). It means that at runtime block
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget
> > (for N900). It means that at runtime block device can be exported
> > or unexported. So it does not export
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget
(for N900). It means that at runtime block device can be exported
or unexported. So it does not export anything by
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 08:07:25PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 06 July 2015 19:44:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget
(for N900). It means that at runtime block device
On Monday 06 July 2015 19:44:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:40:49PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 18:08:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
> It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
> So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
> partition as
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as before...
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as before...
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2015 22:17:09 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > All right, I tried merging it and it added
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 June 2015 22:17:09 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks
On Friday 05 June 2015 22:17:09 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the
> > > tree. I'll wait for another version for v4.3
On Friday 05 June 2015 22:17:09 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the
tree. I'll wait for another version for v4.3 merge
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the tree.
> > I'll wait for another version for v4.3 merge window.
> >
> > cheers
>
> Hello, version below compiles
On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the tree.
> I'll wait for another version for v4.3 merge window.
>
> cheers
Hello, version below compiles fine on top of linus tree. Please apply:
diff --git
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the tree.
I'll wait for another version for v4.3 merge window.
cheers
Hello, version below compiles fine on
On Friday 29 May 2015 18:57:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
All right, I tried merging it and it added build breaks to the tree.
I'll wait for another version for v4.3 merge window.
cheers
Hello, version below compiles fine on top of linus tree. Please apply:
diff --git
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 28 May 2015 18:34:31 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > > > On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 18:34:31 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday
On Thursday 28 May 2015 18:34:31 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > > On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > >
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>>On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
> >>It means that at runtime block device can be
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
> It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
> So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
> partition as
On Thursday 28 May 2015 18:34:31 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:59:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:51:07 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:27:44 Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:47 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 31
On Saturday 07 February 2015 19:33:53 Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7.02.2015 20:01, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
> gadget (for N900). It means that at runtime block device can
> be exported or unexported. So it does not export anything by
> default and thus allows to use MyDocs partition as
On Saturday 31 January 2015 10:53:30 Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
gadget (for N900). It means that at runtime block device can
be exported or unexported. So it does not export anything by
default and thus allows to use MyDocs partition as
On Saturday 07 February 2015 19:33:53 Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi,
On 7.02.2015 20:01, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb
Hi,
On 7.02.2015 20:01, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02
On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat,
On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat,
Hi,
On 7.02.2015 20:01, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
On 2.02.2015 21:14, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:14:35 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Monday 02 February 2015
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:14:35 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > This patch adds
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
> > > gadget (for N900). It means
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
> > gadget (for N900). It means that at runtime block device
> > can be exported or unexported. So it does
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
> It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
> So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
>
Hello Pali,
W dniu 31.01.2015 o 10:53, Pali Rohár pisze:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
For a hint please see this thread:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg119669.html
Hello Pali,
W dniu 31.01.2015 o 10:53, Pali Rohár pisze:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
For a hint please see this thread:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg119669.html
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
gadget (for N900). It means that at runtime block device
can be exported or unexported. So it does not export
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia
gadget (for N900). It means that at
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
This patch adds removable mass storage
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:07:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 20:01:11 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:58:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2015 19:54:58 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:53:30AM
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as before...
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
This patch adds removable mass storage support to g_nokia gadget (for N900).
It means that at runtime block device can be exported or unexported.
So it does not export anything by default and thus allows to use MyDocs
partition as before...
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
On Mon 2013-01-21 10:05:06, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> > >
> > > NAK
On Mon 2013-01-21 10:05:06, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
NAK
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 17:17:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 20 January
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at
On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> > >
> > >
On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100,
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 17:17:21 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2013 09:05:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> >
> > NAK for two reasons:
> >
> > a) the original Nokia kernel used a
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
NAK for two reasons:
a) the original Nokia kernel used
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
>
> NAK for two reasons:
>
> a) the original Nokia kernel used a separate g_file_storage
> gadget to use Mass Storage mode, use that
>
> b) there
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
NAK for two reasons:
a) the original Nokia kernel used a separate g_file_storage gadget to
use Mass Storage mode, use that
b) there is no commit log
--
balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
NAK for two reasons:
a) the original Nokia kernel used a separate g_file_storage gadget to
use Mass Storage mode, use that
b) there is no commit log
--
balbi
signature.asc
On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:25:37 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:58:13AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
NAK for two reasons:
a) the original Nokia kernel used a separate g_file_storage
gadget to use Mass Storage mode, use that
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c
index 661600a..56409ee 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c
index 661600a..56409ee 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c
+++
78 matches
Mail list logo
