On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 09:47:20 AM Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> radeonfb_pci_suspend() is never called in atomic context.
>
> radeonfb_pci_suspend() is only set as ".suspend" in struct pci_driver.
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 09:47:20 AM Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> radeonfb_pci_suspend() is never called in atomic context.
>
> radeonfb_pci_suspend() is only set as ".suspend" in struct pci_driver.
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
radeonfb_pci_suspend() is never called in atomic context.
radeonfb_pci_suspend() is only set as ".suspend" in struct pci_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, radeonfb_pci_suspend()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not
radeonfb_pci_suspend() is never called in atomic context.
radeonfb_pci_suspend() is only set as ".suspend" in struct pci_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, radeonfb_pci_suspend()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not
4 matches
Mail list logo
