Kent Overstreet writes:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:25AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Kent Overstreet writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> >> > Do you not understand
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:25AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kent Overstreet writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> > Do you not understand the difference between depends an
Kent Overstreet writes:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> > Do you not understand the difference between depends an selects?
>> > Or did you not read my original mail?
Now you're getting
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:31:44AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:18:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:18:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > Kent Overstreet
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Kent Overstreet writes:
> > >
> > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Kent Overstreet writes:
> >
> > > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> > > instead.
> >
> > This is a slight
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kent Overstreet writes:
>
> > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> > instead.
>
> This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
> the particular driver, probably virtio_pci
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular driver,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:18:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:31:44AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:18:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:02:48AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Do you not understand the difference between depends an selects?
Or did you not read my original mail?
Now
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:25AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Do you not understand the difference between
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:25AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Kent Overstreet writes:
>>
>> > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
>> > instead.
>>
>> This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
>> the
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kent Overstreet writes:
>
> > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> > instead.
>
> This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
> the particular driver, probably virtio_pci
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:54:07PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> >> On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >>> Kent Overstreet writes:
> >>>
> CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed,
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:54:07PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On 09/05/2012 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular driver,
On 09/05/2012 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>> On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Kent Overstreet writes:
>>>
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
>>>
>>> This is a
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Kent Overstreet writes:
> >
> >> CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> >> instead.
> >
> > This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be
On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kent Overstreet writes:
>
>> CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
>> instead.
>
> This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
> the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your case.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kent Overstreet writes:
>
>> CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
>> instead.
>
> This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
> the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your
Kent Overstreet writes:
> CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your case.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your case.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular
On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to be selected by
the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a slight mis-understanding. It's supposed to
On 09/05/2012 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:22:58PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
On 09/04/2012 02:23 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com writes:
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
This is a
Whoops, need VIRTIO_RING too
>From 79dc9ae40e40cefd6079e4197cac858a1d59e1d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kent Overstreet
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:44:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
Sig
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
---
drivers/block/Kconfig |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
index a796407..d4e1d12 100644
---
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com
---
drivers/block/Kconfig |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
index
Whoops, need VIRTIO_RING too
From 79dc9ae40e40cefd6079e4197cac858a1d59e1d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kent Overstreet koverstr...@google.com
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:44:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option
CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select
42 matches
Mail list logo