Re: [PATCH] x86, msr/cpuid: Cocci spatch "ptr_ret.spatch"

2013-06-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
This is not an acceptable patch... no description of any kind and a subject line which would only make sense if the cocci scripts are checked into the kernel tree. Thomas Meyer wrote: > >Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer >--- > >diff -u -p a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c >---

[PATCH] x86, msr/cpuid: Cocci spatch "ptr_ret.spatch"

2013-06-01 Thread Thomas Meyer
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer --- diff -u -p a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static __cpuinit int cpuid_device_create dev = device_create(cpuid_class, NULL, MKDEV(CPUID_MAJOR, cpu), NULL,

[PATCH] x86, msr/cpuid: Cocci spatch ptr_ret.spatch

2013-06-01 Thread Thomas Meyer
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer tho...@m3y3r.de --- diff -u -p a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static __cpuinit int cpuid_device_create dev = device_create(cpuid_class, NULL,

Re: [PATCH] x86, msr/cpuid: Cocci spatch ptr_ret.spatch

2013-06-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
This is not an acceptable patch... no description of any kind and a subject line which would only make sense if the cocci scripts are checked into the kernel tree. Thomas Meyer tho...@m3y3r.de wrote: Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer tho...@m3y3r.de --- diff -u -p a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c