On 18/05/16 18:13, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 12:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 17:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 11:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 10:
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 12:03 -0600, Tony S wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Tony S
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> > wrote:
> > > Tony narrowed the problem down to update_curr() where vruntime is
> > > calculated, based on runqueue's clock_task value. Tha
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Tony S wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 12:10 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:53 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> Won't we be accounti
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 12:10 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:53 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Won't we be accounting for stolen cycles twice now --- once from
steal_ac
On 05/18/2016 12:10 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:53 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Won't we be accounting for stolen cycles twice now --- once from
>>> steal_account_process_tick()->steal_clock() and second time from
>>> do
On 05/18/2016 12:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 17:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 11:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:53 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> > Won't we be accounting for stolen cycles twice now --- once from
> > steal_account_process_tick()->steal_clock() and second time from
> > do_stolen_accounting()?
> Uuh, yes.
>
> I guess I s
On 18/05/16 17:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 11:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 08:
On 18/05/16 16:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 17:45, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM,
On 05/18/2016 11:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> }
>>
>>
On 18/05/16 17:45, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> }
>>
>>
On 18/05/16 16:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> }
>
> +void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
> +{
On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
>>> +{
>>> + pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_steal_clock;
>>> +
>>> + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_e
On 18/05/16 17:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 10:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
}
+void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
+{
+ pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_steal_cloc
On 18/05/16 16:46, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> }
>>
>> +void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
>> +{
>> +pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_steal_clock;
>> +
>> +static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_enabled);
>> +/*
>> + * We can't set paravirt_
On 05/18/2016 08:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> }
>
> +void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
> +{
> + pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_steal_clock;
> +
> + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_enabled);
> + /*
> + * We can't set paravirt_steal_rq_enabled as this would require the
> +
With CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING the kernel is capable to account
for time a thread wasn't able to run due to hypervisor scheduling.
Add support in Xen arch independent time handling for this feature by
moving it out of the arm arch into drivers/xen.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
arch/arm
17 matches
Mail list logo
