Re: [PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

> following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with > loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not > totally sure this is quite correct. loops_per_jiffy*HZ overflows at 2GHz for an int. If the alpha is using ulong for this I guess it works fine at 64bits. - To unsubscribe from this

[PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

Hi Alan, 2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will see later why (unknown references to

[PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

Hi Alan, 2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will see later why (unknown references to

Re: [PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy

following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. loops_per_jiffy*HZ overflows at 2GHz for an int. If the alpha is using ulong for this I guess it works fine at 64bits. - To unsubscribe from this